![carbon filters carbon filters](https://www.h2odistributors.com/global/productpics/l/ft-2-gac-20-2_l.jpg)
I wouldn’t have even tested this, but Anna accidentally forgot to attach the HEPA and unknowingly ran a regular particulate room test with carbon only.ĭuring the gas test, all of the doors and windows were closed. Carbon captures gas pollutants, not particulate pollution. Nearby sources of gas pollutants (such as living near a factory)Ħ. Symptoms such as inflammation and asthma Do I Still Need The HEPA? We need more tests like this to be sure.įor now, I will not be using carbon in my home, but I think it is right for people whose homes have:ĥ. For example, scientists in Hong Kong tested homes and found that most non-smoking homes did not have un-safe levels of VOCs. However, scientists have used fancier methods and found similar results. I bet I’d pick up small amounts of VOCs if I sent air samples to a laboratory.
![carbon filters carbon filters](https://utvraceworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BLOWER-FILTER-3-AC-LG.jpg)
Photo ionization detectors like the MX6 are not the most sensitive test type out there. Now, I don’t want to say that VOCs are never a problem. That makes sense, since lots of VOCs have noticeable smells, like benzene, toluene, and formaldehyde. And in all of the places where the MX6 detected VOCs, I was able to notice a chemical smell. I only found VOCs in homes that had an obvious source of pollution such as remodeling or smoke. I don’t want to scare people into buying carbon. Why? In most homes, my MX6 detected zero VOCs. They make more money if they can scare people into buying carbon.
![carbon filters carbon filters](https://www.melbournehydro.com/assets/full/CF_6.jpg)
But does everyone need carbon? Purifier companies have a financial incentive to convince people to buy carbon filters.